Discover and connect with journalists and influencers around the world, save time on email research, monitor the news, and more.
Recent: |
|
Past: |
|
If the conservative justices abandon the doctrine just because they have the votes, they will reinforce the message from Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health last year that relying on precedent is out the window. → Read More
Dimmed light may be what Judge Kacsmaryk prefers as he conducts his judicial process. → Read More
His purpose is transparent. → Read More
Harvard Law professor emeritus Laurence H. Tribe and former federal prosecutor Dennis Aftergut argue that newly elected House Speaker Kevin McCarthy chose ambition over law, order, and country. Professor Tribe and Mr. Aftergut describe how Speaker McCarthy’s concessions to the radical Republicans put us over the brink and seriously endanger democracy. → Read More
A new subpoena is the latest step showing the DOJ’s man in charge is aggressively pursuing his target. → Read More
Five important legal rulings this week show that the nation’s courthouses remain central to preserving constitutional order. → Read More
Harvard Law professor emeritus Laurence H. Tribe comments on a decision by a federal judge in Texas vacating the Biden administration’s loan forgiveness program. Professor Tribe argues that Judge Mark... → Read More
There may not be a smoking gun. But when dealing with something as basic as the right to vote and to have one’s vote counted, circumstantial evidence this powerful ought to suffice. → Read More
The point of remembering our agitated past is to gain hope, not despair. → Read More
It does not matter whether Thomas imposed or denied Sen. Lindsey Graham’s desired stay of a Georgia subpoena; he wasn’t supposed to rule at all. → Read More
If the Supreme Court adopts the position advocated by pork producers, many other state laws might end up on the chopping block. → Read More
Why is a young, ideologically-driven judge with a lifetime appointment to the bench allowed to ignore legal precedents? → Read More
The perfect cannot be the enemy of the good, but this still needs fixing. → Read More
We were lucky last time. A multitude of law-abiding individuals and fortunate events stopped the “quiet” phase of the coup to keep Donald Trump in power. That could well change in 2024. → Read More
If the court's conservatives adopt the independent state legislature theory, they would be making up law to create an outcome of one-party rule. → Read More
On Monday, the supreme court justice issued a worrying signal about his commitment to maintaining press freedoms → Read More
Holding Trump accountable — and disqualifying him from future office — would not be a partisan act, but one needed to preserve the republic. → Read More
In light of Justice Samuel Alito’s leaked draft in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., which would overrule Roe v. Wade and its progeny, UChicago Law professor emeritus Albert W. Alschuler and Harva... → Read More
If the high court adopts Alito’s draft opinion, it will be a legal tidal wave that sweeps away a swath of rights unlike anything America has ever seen → Read More
If the right of a woman to decide whether to have a baby won’t qualify as a guaranteed right, then neither will most of the rights you have long assumed are yours. → Read More