Discover and connect with journalists and influencers around the world, save time on email research, monitor the news, and more.
Recent: |
|
Past: |
|
For a decade, Wikipedia has been the site of a passionate war between cryptozoologists and skeptics. → Read More
There might be a way to bring in technology without removing Wikipedia’s humanity. → Read More
For many of Wikipedia’s most dedicated contributors, this year’s proposed banner ads presented something like a moral crisis. → Read More
A conspiracy theory, fueled by a recent article, is alarmingly wrong. → Read More
Quantum flapdoodle strikes again. → Read More
An administrator candidate spoke out against Trump voters, and then all Wikipedia hell broke loose. → Read More
So far, editors have reverted the many attempts to replace all references to “Tesla CEO” with “Tesla Technoking” on Musk’s Wikipedia page. → Read More
What would Socrates think? He’d probably start a dialogue in the comments. → Read More
To understand, we have to begin with the 17-year edit war over “Kyiv” vs. “Kiev.” → Read More
Godwin’s law is nearly as old as the internet itself. → Read More
Beijing has been on icy terms with Wikipedia for years. Now the battle is heating up. → Read More
Sept. 11 and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan helped make Wikipedia into the so-called last bastion of shared reality that it is today. → Read More
Until recently, a small Wikipedia edition said Dianne Feinstein was San Francisco's mayor. This project could help avoid that sort of out of date info. → Read More
Wikipedia has a few blind spots you should know about. → Read More
The English-language Wikipedia is down to fewer than 10,000 uses of the Daily Mail as a source. → Read More
In some ways, the use of macros in video games to overcome a disability parallels the Oscar Pistorius prosthetic fairness debate. → Read More
For Wikipedia to fulfill its mission, it needs to be welcoming to all—which means tackling its harassment problem. → Read More
If you use Wikipedia, you should consider editing it, too. → Read More
Sure, the metaphor is imperfect. But as the encyclopedia enters its 20th year, it's worth reflecting on the "rules of the game"—and how they might change. → Read More
By enlisting volunteer Wikipedia editors to decide on issues of notability or fake news, tech companies are keeping down their labor costs. → Read More