Discover and connect with journalists and influencers around the world, save time on email research, monitor the news, and more.
Recent: |
|
Past: |
|
I am pleased to announce Oxford University Press’s publication of “The Future Law of Armed Conflict,” a volume I co-edited with my former student and member of West Point’s law department, Tom Oakley. → Read More
A recent State Department legal analysis highlights the unique roles that the United States plays in interpreting and enforcing maritime law in the South China Sea. This legal diplomacy also illustrates methodological challenges of customary international law. → Read More
We recently contributed to an essay in the 2020 "Strategic Survey" that discusses key international legal gaps in areas relating to international security and suggests how states can work to address them. → Read More
The United States has one of the world’s strongest and most sophisticated capabilities to launch cyberattacks against adversaries. How does the US Constitution allocate power to use that capability? And what does that allocation tell us about appropriate executive-legislative branch arrangements for setting and implementing cyber strategy? → Read More
President Trump’s recent refusals to commit to a peaceful transfer of power have called to mind historical contrasts. → Read More
Professor Stephen Griffin (of Tulane) and I have posted to SSRN what we’re calling our free “model casebook chapter” on constitutional war powers. → Read More
Eisenhower never initiated a major armed conflict. Still, his administration offers critical insight for modern war powers questions. → Read More
Lawfare’s Bobby Chesney and Matt Waxman have launched “The National Security Law Lectures”: a free series of lectures on an array of national security law topics. → Read More
The outcome of the war—and the means necessary to achieve it—led to the war’s most noteworthy constitutional precedents. → Read More
CFR's Matthew Waxman says the Trump administration is making a mistake in providing vague and shifting legal rationales for the killing of an Iranian general. → Read More
A new set of essays explores the state and possible trajectory of modern war powers. → Read More
A story about very expensive bird$h*t, or guano, and how one of the 19th century’s most important thinkers on war powers nearly stumbled the nation, figuratively speaking, into a giant pile of it. → Read More
In a new Washington Quarterly article, the authors argue that the post-World War II expansion of the presidential alliance powers enables President Trump to weaken alliances from within. → Read More
A 1962 Justice Department memo offers a rare glimpse of the legal rationale for covert warfare. → Read More
In 1957, Congress granted President Eisenhower authorization to use force in the Middle East. The law is still on the books 62 years later. → Read More
Eisenhower believed that a congressional authorization of force, including the possible use of nuclear weapons, to protect Taiwan from Communist China would help prevent all-out war from breaking out across the Taiwan Strait. → Read More
Jan. 10 marks 81 years since Congress defeated a proposed constitutional amendment to add a referendum requirement to the war declaration power. → Read More
The Monroe Doctrine is a momentous example of the president’s vast constitutional power to set and communicate U.S. foreign policy—to include threatening war. → Read More
A review of Michael Beschloss, “Presidents of War” (Crown Books, 2018). → Read More
Today is the centennial Armistice Day, remembered as the day the Great War ended, but as a matter of U.S. domestic law, it dragged on for another three years. → Read More